Field Notes: Truth Serum Edition offers unfiltered, anonymous commentary from UTMB SPPH students on current public health issues. It’s a glimpse into how our future public health leaders are thinking, questioning, and pushing for change.
Summary
Utah has become the first U.S. state to ban fluoride in public drinking water, with the law set to take effect on May 7, 2025. Supporters of the ban, including Governor Spencer Cox, argue that fluoridation is unnecessary government interference and an added expense. Opponents, including dentists and health organizations, warn that removing fluoride could lead to increased dental problems, especially for low-income communities. The CDC has long endorsed water fluoridation as a key public health measure, but recent studies have raised concerns about potential health risks from excessive fluoride exposure. Similar legislative efforts are being considered in other states, including Florida, Ohio, and South Carolina. The impact of Utah’s decision on public dental health will be closely monitored in the coming years.
📚 Catch up on the last Field Notes? In the previous installment of our Truth Serum Edition series, a UTMB SPPH student weighed in on the EPA’s environmental rollbacks and what they mean for coastal communities.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognizes community water fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 1900s. Fluoride reduces 25% of tooth decay in children and adults. This ban has scary implications for all Americans, because it will empower other states that have been pushing this agenda to pursue banning fluoridation as well.
There is no valid reason to outright ban fluoridation. While there has been a study discussing the harmful effects of excessive fluoride exposure, other studies maintain that community level fluoridation is not likely to reach a toxic level. This ban will absolutely harm low-income and rural communities who have reduced access to dental care. If politicians do not care about the health of the people and think fluoridation is an unnecessary expense, they need to have the numbers to back it up. The cost-effectiveness of fluoridation speaks for itself.
While pursuing my degree at UTMB, we have discussed the efficacy of upstream solutions: targeting a problem at its source and dealing with it accordingly. Fluoridation is a perfect example of an upstream solution: it is accessible to all social classes, it is very effective in prevention of cavities, and it saves everyone money! Unfortunately, after a ban like this, public health and clinical practitioners will be forced to deal with this health issue as cases arise instead of preventing them from the start. I implore all public health professionals to loudly oppose the fluoridation ban.
While this ban is taking place in Utah, Texas is facing a similar movement. The Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller has called for a statewide ban, and some cities have already discontinued water fluoridation. We must contact our representatives at local and state levels to show our support for fluoridation. You can identify your state representatives here. Below is a template to express your support of fluoridation.
Letter Template
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
[Date]
The Honorable [Representative’s Name]
[Their Office Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
Subject: Continued Support for Community Water Fluoridation
Dear [Representative’s Name],
I am writing to express my strong support for community water fluoridation (CWF) and to encourage you to continue advocating for this essential public health measure. As a [concerned citizen/healthcare professional/community leader], I recognize the significant role fluoridation plays in promoting oral health and preventing tooth decay for individuals of all ages.
Decades of scientific research, endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Dental Association (ADA), and the World Health Organization (WHO), confirm that fluoridation is a safe, cost-effective, and equitable way to reduce dental cavities. Numerous studies show that communities with fluoridated water experience fewer dental issues, leading to lower healthcare costs and improved overall well-being, particularly among children, seniors, and underserved populations.
Despite its proven benefits, community water fluoridation continues to face challenges from misinformation and unfounded concerns. It is crucial that we rely on sound science and public health expertise to guide policy decisions that impact our communities. I urge you to continue supporting policies that maintain and expand fluoridation efforts in [your city/state] to ensure that everyone, regardless of socioeconomic status, has access to this critical preventive measure.
I appreciate your dedication to public health and your leadership on this important issue. Please let me know if there are any upcoming discussions or initiatives regarding water fluoridation — I would be happy to offer my support in any way possible.
Thank you for your time and commitment to the health of our community. I look forward to your response and continued advocacy for evidence-based policies.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
📣 Are you an SPPH student with something to say? Submit your perspective on a current public health issue by contacting us at SPPHmarketing@utmb.edu.